Gleanings eNewsletter
September 2010 ~ part 2

GLEANINGS: n. 1. That which has been acquired by gleaning. 2. The monthly eNewsletter of CT NOFA. [Glean:v. 1. to gather relevant information or material by patient effort, bit by bit; to find out. 2. to gather grain or other produce (often: left by reapers); to harvest.]

green divider
From the Executive Director (cont.)

This August has been anything but the slow season for our work.

We’ve been educating: Just during the first week, we held an Advanced Soil Testing workshop for land care professionals in Bloomfield, educated 50 land care professionals in Organic Lawn and Turf Management in Providence, Rhode Island and produced the spectacular City Farm and Garden Tour in New Haven.  I’m still hearing good things from the tour participants.

At the Beardsley Zoo, we trained about two-dozen professionals (including a number of Zoo employees) in organic techniques for Invasive Plant Removal, and later in the month, we held two successful on-farm workshops.  The first of these was at The Hickories in Ridgefield where Dina Brewster talked about the development and running of her 200 member CSA.  The second was at the Community Farm of Simsbury featuring their Incubator Farm program.

The Homeowners Organic Land Care Workshop series continued this summer with workshops in Meriden and North Haven. 

And we’ve been advocating:

We’ve had tables promoting organic farms and land care at Plant Science Day, Hartford’s West End Farmers Market, CitySeed Farmers Market and Wallingford’s Gardeners Market.

Earlier in the summer, we hosted Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro at Common Ground High School and attended the Governor’s signing of the Farms, Food and Jobs bill that was passed in the legislature.

RJThe only reason that we can accomplish all this important work is the dedication and energy of our wonderful staff, Deb Legge, Ashley Kremser, Clara Buitrago and Marion Griswold.  We’ll soon be joined by a Public Ally, Robert Joseph (RJ) Mercede (photo).  Public Allies is a leadership development program for young folks that is part of Americorps.  We look forward to having RJ’s help.

We thank you for your interest in our work and for your participation and support.  I’m always happy to have your suggestions and ideas.

NOFA Credit Card:
In order to raise money for NOFA’s important policy work, the NOFA Interstate Council has established a Credit Card program with Capital One.  NOFA gets $50 with each first use of a card and 2% of the value of gasoline and grocery purchases and 1% on other purchases.  There are three NOFA themed designs to choose from.  Please visit www.cardlabconnect.com/NOFA  to apply for a card today.  We recommend paying off the balance each month to avoid interest costs.

green divider


Farm Feature (cont.)

bristol farm workers


Mark took a break from tractor work.  Joanie and their young employees were harvesting carrots.


They have a very nice sales room for their produce and a selection of other local food.


Note the husk or ground cherries in the boxes at the right of the picture.  Both Bristol Farm and The Hickories praised this somewhat exotic fruit as something that grows easily and is much liked by kids.

Note also the farm’s tomato sauce, bottled in a certified organic facility in New Haven.  They also sell McEnroe’s organic potting soil there.



Their bumper crop of watermelons nearly filled of the back of a Suburban- A Suburban Watermelon Sale.



Their CSA program is designed to reduce the rush of getting all the shares ready on one day and to drive customers to the sales room.  Customers who buy a CSA share in the winter receive vouchers (at a 19 percent discount) for shopping at the sales room whenever it is open.

winter squash

They had a good crop of winter squash this year.  Here is some of it ripening in the greenhouse.  There were still lots more in the field.

Their late lettuces and brassicas were growing well.  Mark is finding that some of the late brassicas do real well growing on plastic.

bristol greens

Mark changed careers not too many years ago.  After working at Riverbank Farm in Roxbury to learn farming, he started Wild Carrot Farm.  In addition to the CSA and sales room, they sell at the Canton/Collinsville, Windsor and Litchfield Farmers Markets.  Their market stand is a riot of multicolored peppers and heirloom tomatoes.


green divider
Guest Columnist ~ Jack Bradigan Spula (cont.)

But several stakes – in the hands of various powerful “stakeholders” – still pierce the heart of this unparalleled subtropical marine ecosystem. And perhaps the most serious one has been hiding in plain sight for decades.

Specifically, the Gulf is an oceanic hostage to a terrestrial threat that dominates the “heartland” of the Lower Forty-eight: modern industrialized agriculture. And if ever there was an ecological wolf in sheep’s clothing, this is it: “conventional” farms throughout the vast Mississippi-Missouri-Ohio basin produce nitrogen and phosphorus runoff on a massive scale that creates a Gulf “dead zone” depleted of oxygen and inimical to aquatic life.

All things considered, this runoff may do more harm to the Gulf’s marine and riparian ecosystems than almost anything BP might dream up. But we need to be more specific. It’s not farming per se that’s the problem. It’s synthetic fertilizer and other chemical runoff that, having been applied in excess to cornfields and other cultivated areas, is annually washed off “conventionally” cultivated soils upstream – with the rich, or formerly rich soils themselves disappearing into the toxic soup. The mechanism of destruction is simple: The chemical runoff fuels the growth of excessive algae which then dies and decomposes, robbing the seawater of oxygen and creating so-called “hypoxic” zones commonly described as “the size of New Jersey” or Delaware or… perhaps larger states as time goes on.

This perverse process, which tends to be concentrated with the start of the growing season, is also expensive. A 2006 study by the Washington-based Environmental Working Group determined that runoff from the greater Mississippi Basin, at a rate of 7.8 million pounds per day in the springtime, accounted for 70 percent of the nitrate pollution in the Gulf (by contrast, municipal runoff accounted for just 11 percent.) and ran up a bill of $400 million a year.

Following the money further yields some interesting facts. These nitrates and phosphates hail from agricultural states that themselves are saturated with vast public agricultural “commodity” payments – in particular, the tens of billions in payouts that form the bulk of what’s summarized as the federal Farm Bill and underwrites large corn, soybean and similar operations concentrated in the “I States” (Iowa, Illinois, Indiana). There’s also an odd inverse relationship between these payments, which of course promote the erosion that accompanies the intense cultivation of these croplands, and the public conservation subsidies – specifically, wetland-preservation and water-quality payments - designed to keep soil from washing away. According to the EWG study, in the most highly offending geographical areas, the ratio of subsidies that actually promote soil loss to those that promote soil conservation and clean water can be 1000 to one, or even worse.

The EWG notes some obvious solutions. For example, since the upstream agricultural areas whose runoff is growing the Gulf’s Dead Zone are relatively concentrated geographically, remediation efforts can be concentrated, as well, and thus more effective. But the fine print gives good cause for skepticism on this point. Says the EWG: “Focusing resources on reducing fertilizer runoff in these hotspots through wetland restoration, streamside easements and better nutrient management on working farm lands will improve local water quality, restore stream and river banks, help control floodwaters, and ultimately reduce the size of the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Currently, however, trends are in the opposite direction. In the nitrate pollution hotspots…less than 3 percent of the acreage is enrolled in any kind of conservation program. Overall, acres set aside for conservation in the MRB have declined over 30 percent since their peak in 1993” (emphasis added).

Obviously, efforts to stem the flow of phosphorus and nitrogen “nutrients” downriver and into the Gulf of Mexico will need to go way beyond what’s possible with even the best conventional conservation practices. Certainly the dominance of King Corn, Cotton, and other commodities, plus the attendant (and unfortunately legalized) corruption of federal supports, must be addressed.

Nothing short of a wholesale shift to organic agriculture, coupled with the adoption of smart hydrological practices, will be up to the task.

Just by themselves, policies that treat rivers and wetlands like natural systems will go a long way. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) claimed in a 1999 study that more than 50 percent of nitrogen runoff from the Mississippi Basin could be eliminated by such measures as “the creation and restoration of wetlands and riparian [i.e. streambank and shoreline] ecosystems between farmland and streams and rivers,” the “reflooding” of former wetlands throughout the region, plus the retention and/or diversion of floodwaters to the “backwaters” and coastal wetlands that were historically – and properly – their destinations.

But there’s no reason to stop at 50 percent. A huge additional reduction in problematic runoff could be achieved by going organic.

The Rodale Institute points out that “converting acres of cropland to organically-grown agriculture… greatly increases soil organic matter and includes nutrient-retaining ‘trap’ crops. Soil scientists refer to these “traps” as among the “reservoirs” that keep nitrogen where it belongs and in the lower concentrations that keep it from turning into water pollution. Other organic farming practices, says the Institute, would help, too – simple things like “returning crop land to pasture and growing more multi-year forage crops.” Healthy soil, nurtured by organic practices that increase humus content and thus water-retention capacity, grows healthy plants that don’t cast off excessive nitrogen and other “wastes.” And in tandem, healthy soil and crops act as the ultimate control devices for cleansing the water that eventually winds up in the Gulf.

The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a target – a 45 percent reduction in nitrate runoff by the year 2015 – to kill off the Gulf’s dead zone. That’s in line with what the NOAA says is possible by conventional means. But organic farmers and enthusiasts know that much more of a reduction is possible through a revolution in farming. It’s not possible to get to 100 percent (nitrates, etc., wind up in the water via atmospheric deposition, municipal runoff, and other vectors that cry out for their own solutions), but why not set a target of, say, a 75-80 percent reduction over the coming years? Something in that range should be attainable if organic becomes the conventional form – the “new normal,” you might say - of US agriculture.

Jack Bradigan Spula is a Rochester (NY)-based freelance writer and activist who works with the Northeast Organic Farming Association’s Interstate Council.

green divider
Thanks to our Sponsors:

stonyfield logoglobal logo 2Ross bread logowhole foods logo

green divider

Let us know what you think of the expanded format. We'd like to add additional member profiles and other news of interest. If you have any stories, articles, notices or suggestions for this newsletter, please send them along.

Many thanks,

CT NOFA | PO Box 164 | Stevenson | CT | 06491